Krisis Krisis
  • Submissions
  • Open calls
  • Sponsoring
  • Archive
  • About
  • en
    • nl
  • NL
  • /
  • ENG

Author: Chunglin Kwa

Chunglin Kwa is universitair docent Wetenschapsstudies bij de afdeling Politicologie van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. In 2011 verscheen van hem Styles of knowing. A new history of science from ancient times to the present bij de University of Pittsburgh Press en dit jaar verschijnt Kernthema’s in de wetenschapsfilosofie bij uitgeverij Boom Lemma.

Hoe kan de klimaatscepsis het hoofd geboden worden?

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on December 29, 2016July 1, 2018Categories Contribution, ReviewLeave a comment on Hoe kan de klimaatscepsis het hoofd geboden worden?

Issue 1, 2014

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on June 29, 2014December 29, 2016Categories IssueLeave a comment on Issue 1, 2014

Onderzoek aan de universiteiten

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on December 20, 2007April 20, 2017Categories Contribution, EssayLeave a comment on Onderzoek aan de universiteiten

Issue 4, 2007

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on December 20, 2007December 15, 2017Categories IssueLeave a comment on Issue 4, 2007

Het schandaal van de dingen. Een reactie op Gerard de Vries

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on March 30, 2001April 30, 2017Categories Contribution, EssayLeave a comment on Het schandaal van de dingen. Een reactie op Gerard de Vries

Issue 1, 2001

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on March 30, 2001May 10, 2017Categories IssueLeave a comment on Issue 1, 2001

Pro en contra het relativisme – maar welk relativisme?

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on January 16, 1995July 1, 2018Categories Contribution, ReviewLeave a comment on Pro en contra het relativisme – maar welk relativisme?

Issue 1, 1995

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on January 16, 1995September 16, 2017Categories IssueLeave a comment on Issue 1, 1995

Op sterven na dood (Petran Kockelkoren, ‘Boven de groene zoden’)

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on December 10, 1991September 10, 2017Categories Contribution, EssayLeave a comment on Op sterven na dood (Petran Kockelkoren, ‘Boven de groene zoden’)

Evenwichtig en beheerst. Een technologisch ideaal ter discussie

Author Chunglin KwaPosted on December 10, 1991September 10, 2017Categories Contribution, EssayLeave a comment on Evenwichtig en beheerst. Een technologisch ideaal ter discussie

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 Next page

Recent Posts

  • Krisis is op zoek naar een redactiesecretaris
  • Black Marxism
  • Introduction Krisis 2019-1
  • How to Engage in Practices of Critique? From a Universal Conception of the Good Life to the Contestation of Universals
  • The Archipolitics of Jacques Rancière

Recent Comments

  • Different ways to look at the internet and the World - Can't Be Arsed on Militant Research
  • Development: A Failed Project – Enjeux énergies et environnement on Imperial Mode of Living
  • Development: A Failed Project - Resilience on Imperial Mode of Living
  • Development: a failed project – Convivial Thinking on Imperial Mode of Living
  • ghosts (at) on Acid Communism

Archives

  • April 2020
  • January 2020
  • October 2019
  • May 2019
  • July 2018
  • April 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • October 2015
  • April 2015
  • December 2014
  • June 2014
  • December 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • December 2012
  • August 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • August 2011
  • March 2011
  • December 2010
  • August 2010
  • March 2010
  • December 2009
  • July 2009
  • March 2009
  • December 2008
  • August 2008
  • March 2008
  • December 2007
  • August 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • August 2006
  • May 2006
  • March 2006
  • December 2005
  • August 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • December 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • March 2004
  • December 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • March 2003
  • December 2002
  • July 2002
  • March 2002
  • December 2001
  • September 2001
  • June 2001
  • March 2001
  • December 2000
  • August 2000
  • May 2000
  • March 2000
  • January 2000
  • December 1999
  • August 1999
  • May 1999
  • March 1999
  • December 1998
  • September 1998
  • August 1998
  • June 1998
  • May 1998
  • March 1998
  • December 1997
  • March 1997
  • January 1997
  • December 1996
  • September 1996
  • June 1996
  • May 1996
  • January 1995
  • September 1994
  • July 1994
  • December 1993
  • January 1993
  • December 1992
  • September 1992
  • January 1992
  • December 1991
  • September 1991
  • March 1991
  • December 1990
  • July 1990
  • March 1990
  • December 1989
  • August 1989
  • July 1989
  • May 1989
  • March 1989
  • January 1989
  • December 1988
  • September 1988
  • June 1988
  • March 1988
  • December 1987
  • September 1987
  • June 1987
  • January 1987
  • December 1986
  • September 1986
  • January 1986
  • December 1985
  • August 1985
  • August 1984
  • May 1984
  • December 1983
  • August 1983
  • December 1982
  • July 1982
  • June 1982
  • December 1981
  • July 1981
  • March 1981
  • January 1981
  • May 1950

Categories

  • About
  • About Colofon
  • About Content
  • About Links
  • Article
  • Contribution
  • Essay
  • Interview
  • Introduction
  • Issue
  • Newsitem
  • Open Call
  • Open Call Content
  • Open Call Sidebar
  • Review
  • Submissions
  • Submissions Content
  • Submissions Instructions
  • Submissions PDF
  • Support
  • Support Content
  • Support Sidebar
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org